2,465
edits
→So...
m (→So...) |
(→So...) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
::But why remove them? The links, I mean. --[[User:Politoed666|Politoed666]] 02:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC) | ::But why remove them? The links, I mean. --[[User:Politoed666|Politoed666]] 02:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::No one really bothers to write them, as they click on things to learn about the subject.--'''[[User:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#FE2E9A">''Mew''</span>]] [[User talk:Prmatt11|a.k.a.]] [[Special:Contributions/Prmatt11|Prmatt11]]''' 17:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC) | :::No one really bothers to write them, as they click on things to learn about the subject.--'''[[User:Prmatt11|<span style="color:#FE2E9A">''Mew''</span>]] [[User talk:Prmatt11|a.k.a.]] [[Special:Contributions/Prmatt11|Prmatt11]]''' 17:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I think for Bulbanews, the links serve to provide additional context. They're handy so we don't have to explain every single concept, item or translation. Red links will lead people to a dead end, so they're not providing that information. And I think people who would care enough to create a new article from a red link on Bulbanews would have already been on Bulbapedia. --[[User:Argy|Argy]] 18:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC) | |||