30
edits
No edit summary |
Nathan2055 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Uh, I think Beckett cancelled the magazines because of the economy. Why else would they lose a lot of possible revenue by merging magazines. Besides, Beckett actually moved Unofficial Collector to a bi-monthly subscription, according to the editorial in the final issue. That likely means Beckett was losing money in the economy. --[[User:Nathan2055|Nathan2055]][[User Talk:Nathan2055|<sup>talk</sup>]] 17:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC) | Uh, I think Beckett cancelled the magazines because of the economy. Why else would they lose a lot of possible revenue by merging magazines. Besides, Beckett actually moved Unofficial Collector to a bi-monthly subscription, according to the editorial in the final issue. That likely means Beckett was losing money in the economy. --[[User:Nathan2055|Nathan2055]][[User Talk:Nathan2055|<sup>talk</sup>]] 17:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
:It was the same justification we used on the last article. They couldn't keep they're ''Pokémon Unofficial Collector'' going due to the lawsuit, so they merged it with other magazines. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 17:44, 18 June 2011 (UTC) | :It was the same justification we used on the last article. They couldn't keep they're ''Pokémon Unofficial Collector'' going due to the lawsuit, so they merged it with other magazines. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 17:44, 18 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah. Most likely both of these things are true, I guess the lawsuit caused most of the problems though. --[[User:Nathan2055|Nathan2055]][[User Talk:Nathan2055|<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC) |
edits