Talk:Unused Pokémon design revealed in magazine interview: Difference between revisions
Crimsonnavy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". {{Unsigned|Arkeon}} | Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". {{Unsigned|Arkeon}} | ||
Did it say anywhere in the interview that "Dolly" was planned for Generation V? Because they mentioned the origins of a Generation I Pokemon in the same interview, after all, and besides, I don't think it'd be too hard for them to come up with one more Pokemon to round it out to 650 if they'd really wanted to (but why they didn't is a bit of a mystery to me). [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 04:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:49, 10 February 2011
The reason why there aren't 650?
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- Swagmander 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". - unsigned comment from Arkeon (talk • contribs)
Did it say anywhere in the interview that "Dolly" was planned for Generation V? Because they mentioned the origins of a Generation I Pokemon in the same interview, after all, and besides, I don't think it'd be too hard for them to come up with one more Pokemon to round it out to 650 if they'd really wanted to (but why they didn't is a bit of a mystery to me). Teamrocketspy621 04:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
