Talk:Pokémon Sunday reveals new Pokémon Yanappu: Difference between revisions
There are no discussions on this page.
m (Flying-type?) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
• I heard the super-effective noise when Yanappu attacked Tsutaaja. I know we shouldn't assume, but would that be enough evidence for Acrobat to be Flying-type? [[User:Yurtablemoron|Yurtablemoron]] 03:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | • I heard the super-effective noise when Yanappu attacked Tsutaaja. I know we shouldn't assume, but would that be enough evidence for Acrobat to be Flying-type? [[User:Yurtablemoron|Yurtablemoron]] 03:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: If it had a secondary type, I think it'd be on the card they showed on Pokemon Sunday --[[User:Pleinair|Pleinair]] 23:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::This isn't about Yanappu's secondary type. It's about Acrobat's type, which doesn't have to match Yanuppa's type. I don't think it is though; Fire, Ice, Bug, and Poison are also super effective to grass (Tsutarja's type), even if Acrobat seems more like a flying type move. [[User:Turtwig A|Turtwig A]] 14:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:17, 23 August 2010
• I heard the super-effective noise when Yanappu attacked Tsutaaja. I know we shouldn't assume, but would that be enough evidence for Acrobat to be Flying-type? Yurtablemoron 03:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- If it had a secondary type, I think it'd be on the card they showed on Pokemon Sunday --Pleinair 23:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- This isn't about Yanappu's secondary type. It's about Acrobat's type, which doesn't have to match Yanuppa's type. I don't think it is though; Fire, Ice, Bug, and Poison are also super effective to grass (Tsutarja's type), even if Acrobat seems more like a flying type move. Turtwig A 14:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- If it had a secondary type, I think it'd be on the card they showed on Pokemon Sunday --Pleinair 23:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)