Talk:HeartGold and SoulSilver- a return to form or a lazy rehash?: Difference between revisions

Talk:HeartGold and SoulSilver- a return to form or a lazy rehash? (view source)

338 bytes added , 23 March 2010

m

3,661

edits

Revision as of 02:18, 23 March 2010 (view source) Tc26 (talk \| contribs) m (Protected "Talk:HeartGold and SoulSilver- a return to form or a lazy rehash?": Since I can't really delete this article; we rarely get these kinds of articles ([edit=report] (expires 02:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)) [move=report] (expires 02:18, 30 March 2) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:24, 23 March 2010 (view source) Immewnity (talk \| contribs) m (→‎The fix) Newer edit →
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I am '''NOT''' happy with that. I still think that this should be a candidate for deletion. This is not news. It is an opinion! They should've gone onto the forums, and posted this. That is what I think. -Pokemon1234567890		I am '''NOT''' happy with that. I still think that this should be a candidate for deletion. This is not news. It is an opinion! They should've gone onto the forums, and posted this. That is what I think. -Pokemon1234567890
			:Newspapers have opinions, right? Ever heard of "Letter to the Editor"? Well, Bulbanews is "your community Pokémon newspaper. That means we ''are'' an online newspaper.--'''[[User:Immewnity\|<span style="color:#88AADD">''immewnity''</span>]][[User talk:Immewnity\|the]][[Special:Contributions/Immewnity\|mew]]''' 16:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)