279
edits
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Most months are abbreviated in news style. "January" becomes "Jan." Also, "on" is unnecessary in front of dates in most cases. --[[User:Argy|Argy]] 18:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | Most months are abbreviated in news style. "January" becomes "Jan." Also, "on" is unnecessary in front of dates in most cases. --[[User:Argy|Argy]] 18:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
But months are written out without abbreviations almost everywhere else on the site. I don't see why this "news style" thing has to be followed ''that'' strictly. The "on" seemed necessary to me because there was an "in" almost immediately after it in that sentence. --[[User:Nyoo|nYoo]] 19:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | :But months are written out without abbreviations almost everywhere else on the site. I don't see why this "news style" thing has to be followed ''that'' strictly. The "on" seemed necessary to me because there was an "in" almost immediately after it in that sentence. --[[User:Nyoo|nYoo]] 19:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Also, many other articles have fully written out month names aswell. I don't understand why you make such edits that don't correct anything that was false before. "January" isn't false. I'm not sure about the "on" and I understand the point of removing the amazon link, but this thing with month names is just silly. --[[User:Nyoo|nYoo]] 19:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | :Also, many other articles have fully written out month names aswell. I don't understand why you make such edits that don't correct anything that was false before. "January" isn't false. I'm not sure about the "on" and I understand the point of removing the amazon link, but this thing with month names is just silly. --[[User:Nyoo|nYoo]] 19:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||