8
edits
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Evolution in Pokémon would seem to work differently than in reality. Pokémon evolution is more like metamorphosis and you can be predict exactly what a one Pokémon, for example Pikachu, will evolve into, in this case a Raichu. The predetermined nature of evolution in Pokémon would perhaps be explained by Mew containing the DNA of all the Pokémon, rather than that setting off your nerd-senses about evolutionary misconception. Remember, the Pokémon world is a strange place. Real world science doesn't necessarily hold true there.-[[User:N-Pie|N-Pie]] 09:43, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | Evolution in Pokémon would seem to work differently than in reality. Pokémon evolution is more like metamorphosis and you can be predict exactly what a one Pokémon, for example Pikachu, will evolve into, in this case a Raichu. The predetermined nature of evolution in Pokémon would perhaps be explained by Mew containing the DNA of all the Pokémon, rather than that setting off your nerd-senses about evolutionary misconception. Remember, the Pokémon world is a strange place. Real world science doesn't necessarily hold true there.-[[User:N-Pie|N-Pie]] 09:43, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Talk of evolution within the series is complicated by the fact that there are actually two kinds of evolution at work here: the one that's a mechanic in the games (essentially metamorphosis) and something more akin to ''actual'' evolution, which must have occurred if Mew is the ancestor of other Pokemon. I would consider these processes to be entirely separate, but it's hard to discuss them because they both have the same name. [[User:George Hutcheon|George Hutcheon]] 17:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | :Talk of evolution within the series is complicated by the fact that there are actually two kinds of evolution at work here: the one that's a mechanic in the games (essentially metamorphosis) and something more akin to ''actual'' evolution, which must have occurred if Mew is the ancestor of other Pokemon. I would consider these processes to be entirely separate, but it's hard to discuss them because they both have the same name. [[User:George Hutcheon|George Hutcheon]] 17:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Whilst it's to be assumed two types of evolution must have occurred, it's hard to see through which method Pokémon species diverged. Breeding is an odd concept because whilst traits such as particular moves and abilities are transferable, Pokémon within an egg group do not create hybrids in other ways. Of course, without any more official information it would be impossible to draw any solid conclusions, and because anything is possible there could be almost any reason to explain the Pokédex entry.-[[User:N-Pie|N-Pie]] 21:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | ::Whilst it's to be assumed two types of evolution must have occurred, it's hard to see through which method Pokémon species diverged. Breeding is an odd concept because whilst traits such as particular moves and abilities are transferable, Pokémon within an egg group do not create hybrids in other ways. Of course, without any more official information it would be impossible to draw any solid conclusions, and because anything is possible there could be almost any reason to explain the Pokédex entry.-[[User:N-Pie|N-Pie]] 21:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC) |
edits