7
edits
Talk:Black and White not to be followed by a third version: Difference between revisions
Talk:Black and White not to be followed by a third version (view source)
Revision as of 00:30, 14 February 2011
, 14 February 2011no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=="Unconfirmed" Question== | |||
This is something I really don't understand, and this is a serious inquiry. Bulbapedia/Bulbanews will not allow the leaked, "unconfirmed" list of all the Gen V Pokemon to be posted anywhere, but "unconfirmed" news about Gen V not having a third version is allowed. I really do not understand this. Why are some unconfirmed stories allowed and others aren't? [[User:Jivjov|Jivjov]] 00:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Misleading title== | ==Misleading title== | ||
The title implies that Black and White are going to be the only games for Gen V. However, there are Gen V spin-offs in the making and lots of speculation of a Ruby and Sapphire remake, so I think the title should be at least renamed into something less misleading. Maybe "Black and White might not get a third version".-[[User:Ninterror|Ninterror]] 14:11, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | The title implies that Black and White are going to be the only games for Gen V. However, there are Gen V spin-offs in the making and lots of speculation of a Ruby and Sapphire remake, so I think the title should be at least renamed into something less misleading. Maybe "Black and White might not get a third version".-[[User:Ninterror|Ninterror]] 14:11, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | ||