6
edits
Talk:Black and White not to be followed by a third version: Difference between revisions
Talk:Black and White not to be followed by a third version (view source)
Revision as of 00:23, 15 February 2011
, 15 February 2011→"Unconfirmed" Question
m (→Unused moves: new section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=="Unconfirmed" Question== | =="Unconfirmed" Question== | ||
This is something I really don't understand, and this is a serious inquiry. Bulbapedia/Bulbanews will not allow the leaked, "unconfirmed" list of all the Gen V Pokemon to be posted anywhere, but "unconfirmed" news about Gen V not having a third version is allowed. I really do not understand this. Why are some unconfirmed stories allowed and others aren't? [[User:Jivjov|Jivjov]] 00:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC) | This is something I really don't understand, and this is a serious inquiry. Bulbapedia/Bulbanews will not allow the leaked, "unconfirmed" list of all the Gen V Pokemon to be posted anywhere, but "unconfirmed" news about Gen V not having a third version is allowed. I really do not understand this. Why are some unconfirmed stories allowed and others aren't? [[User:Jivjov|Jivjov]] 00:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I think the key is that this is a story ''about'' unconfirmed information, while things like the leaked list ''are'' unconfirmed information. The story is that unconfirmed information has come out, so it reveals what the unconfirmed info is. However, the info itself doesn't yet have a firm basis, so it should not be integrated into Bulbapedia until more is known. | |||
:And yes, there was an article mentioning the leaked list in Bulbanews, simply reporting that a leaked list had come out. Sorry for the rambling, but it's a little hard to explain easily. (Anyone more knowledgeable about how this works, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.)--[[User:RiverAura|RiverAura]] 00:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Misleading title== | ==Misleading title== | ||