Talk:Generation III: Criticized too often?: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


The Pokemon were great! I loved the Gen III games. I could never get bored with them. I play them all the time (even tough I have got Heartgold which is, by the  way, awesome!) They should remake them, add some Sinnoh pokemon, maybe even some gen V? I don't really mind, but in their defense they are awesome. Pokemon Sapphire all the way! [[User:Kingdonfin|Kingdonfin]]
The Pokemon were great! I loved the Gen III games. I could never get bored with them. I play them all the time (even tough I have got Heartgold which is, by the  way, awesome!) They should remake them, add some Sinnoh pokemon, maybe even some gen V? I don't really mind, but in their defense they are awesome. Pokemon Sapphire all the way! [[User:Kingdonfin|Kingdonfin]]
I do personally prefer Silver to the Generation III games, but that's not to say that there's anything wrong with them.  They have amazing graphics and music, and utlise some ingenious ideas (cable cars, a volcano, a desert, Contests, you name it!) which had not been seen in Pokémon before.  A few of the new Pokémon designs may be a little lacking (I'm looking at you Claydol), but there's plenty of brilliant designs in there too ; Latios, Latias and Groudon in particular are among my all-time favourites.  Hoenn is a tropical region, so the Pokémon are bound to be more exotic!  Lack of connectivity with older games is a bit of a shame (I would have liked to have been able to see my Typhlosion in action on Ruby!) but as stated in the article, it wouldn't have been possible with all the new mechanics.  While not perfect, Ruby and Sapphire (and the other Generation III games which followed) are very well-designed and enjoyable games, and are certainly not worthy of the amount of critisism they receieve.  [[User:Taromon777|Taromon777]] 20:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
25

edits