33
edits
Talk:HeartGold and SoulSilver- a return to form or a lazy rehash?: Difference between revisions
Talk:HeartGold and SoulSilver- a return to form or a lazy rehash? (view source)
Revision as of 14:16, 21 March 2010
, 21 March 2010no edit summary
(added my comment) |
Purimpopoie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This may be a good review, even though I didn't agree with most of these things as well, I agree with everyone above me that this does ''not'' qualify as a news article. I didn't like seeing that what I thought was a "news article" was little more than someone voicing their opinion on things. --[[User:BulbaPediaAid|BulbaPediaAid]] 14:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | This may be a good review, even though I didn't agree with most of these things as well, I agree with everyone above me that this does ''not'' qualify as a news article. I didn't like seeing that what I thought was a "news article" was little more than someone voicing their opinion on things. --[[User:BulbaPediaAid|BulbaPediaAid]] 14:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:It's not being touted as an article; it's an editorial. There needs to be a bigger disclaimer than just noting that it's a "Column", though. Something like "These views are those of the editor and do not reflect the views of Bulbanews", etc, I guess. For the record, I disagree with the article more than many probably do (for example, I do not believe that Ruby/Sapphire were 'missteps' and do not think the cramped Johto Region is the best region ever in a game.--[[User:Purimpopoie|Purimpopoie]] 14:16, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||