Talk:Notched-ear Pichu's English name possibly revealed

From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search

Problems

I'm no expert in B'news style, but:

  • No links to Bulbapedia articles?
  • No explanation of what the Pichu's role in the games/anime is?
  • Is there really not enough information to have more than two sentences?

If someone could advise me on this that would be great. —darklordtrom 23:47, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Has the article for it yet moved?
  • I am not an expert in those completely and would likely get information wrong.
  • I could not think of any at that moment. I now, however, have added another. Yes, three sentences are short. However, the sentences are fairly long and descriptive, unlike multiple ones on Bulbapedia and similar fan sites.--Mew a.k.a. Immewnity* was here at 00:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it has moved. To learn more, simply scanning said article would have been sufficient. That is all I've done to prepare this alternative.
The English name of one of the characters in the twelfth Pokémon movie, Arceus and the Jewel of Life has been revealed on the Pokemon.com website. A new advertisement on the site features the ear of the Pokémon previously known as the Notched-ear Pichu. However, when looking into the URL of said ad's Flash file, it refers to it as the Spiky-ear Pichu. There is a possibility that this name is only used in-coding for the site, or could change before the final revelation.
Pokemon.com is the official, Nintendo-endorsed Pokémon website. It is known for releasing confirmed information about the Pokémon franchise in advance of the release of new games and episodes of the Pokémon anime. The Spiky-ear Pichu is a special Pichu with three spikes in her ear. She appears in the twelfth movie, and makes an appearance in Pokémon HeartGold and SoulSilver as an event-exclusive Pokémon. A trading card featuring her has also been released.
The U.S. release date for Arceus and the Jewel of Life has yet to be announced.
It may not be a work of art, but it's certainly more explanatory. —darklordtrom 01:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
@TC: Fantastic improvement. —darklordtrom 19:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)