2
edits
Talk:Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire: A retrospective review: Difference between revisions
Talk:Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire: A retrospective review (view source)
Revision as of 04:59, 2 August 2019
, 2 August 2019→missing period: new section
Pandakekok (talk | contribs) (→missing period: new section) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In the last section, you write, "The lack of changes will be applauded by those who prefer a purely original experience, while lauded by others who were hoping for a new, fresh take on an old game." I do not think "lauded" was quite the term you were going for there; "lauded" means praised or acclaimed, while I think you were going for something more along the lines of disparaged or criticized. Again, it's pretty minor, but I just thought you might want to edit that word to better reflect what you meant. --[[User:RiverAura|RiverAura]] ([[User talk:RiverAura|talk]]) 04:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | In the last section, you write, "The lack of changes will be applauded by those who prefer a purely original experience, while lauded by others who were hoping for a new, fresh take on an old game." I do not think "lauded" was quite the term you were going for there; "lauded" means praised or acclaimed, while I think you were going for something more along the lines of disparaged or criticized. Again, it's pretty minor, but I just thought you might want to edit that word to better reflect what you meant. --[[User:RiverAura|RiverAura]] ([[User talk:RiverAura|talk]]) 04:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
== missing period == | |||
The sentence "My first game was Blue, which I still have (and it still works!)" doesn't end in a period. It should be like this: "My first game was Blue, which I still have (and it still works!). I am a rare sight on Bulbanews, but that's because I'm not much of a writer. However, I do h..." | |||