3
edits
Talk:Unused Pokémon design revealed in magazine interview: Difference between revisions
Talk:Unused Pokémon design revealed in magazine interview (view source)
Revision as of 03:19, 11 February 2011
, 11 February 2011→The reason why there aren't 650?
Crimsonnavy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Swagmander (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". {{Unsigned|Arkeon}} | Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". {{Unsigned|Arkeon}} | ||
Did it say anywhere in the interview that "Dolly" was planned for Generation V? Because they mentioned the origins of a Generation I Pokemon in the same interview, after all, and besides, I don't think it'd be too hard for them to come up with one more Pokemon to round it out to 650 if they'd really wanted to (but why they didn't is a bit of a mystery to me). [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 04:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
They did say they tried to pace themselves making Gen V. When you consider all the work that is put into each individual Pokémon, (Animated front/backsprite, movepool, stats, type, design, Sugi art, etc.) they might have been like "Ehh; why bother."-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== "Based off" == | |||
C'mon guys. Correct grammar, please. [[User:Takharii|<span style="color:#FFD733;">'''たか'''</span>]][[User talk:Takharii|<span style="color:#DAA520;">'''はり'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Takharii|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''い'''</span>]] 05:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||