Talk:Unused Pokémon design revealed in magazine interview: Difference between revisions
Swagmander (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=The reason why there isn't 650?= Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've g...") |
Swagmander (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=The reason why there | =The reason why there aren't 650?= | ||
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some. | Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". {{Unsigned|Arkeon}} | |||
Did it say anywhere in the interview that "Dolly" was planned for Generation V? Because they mentioned the origins of a Generation I Pokemon in the same interview, after all, and besides, I don't think it'd be too hard for them to come up with one more Pokemon to round it out to 650 if they'd really wanted to (but why they didn't is a bit of a mystery to me). [[User:Teamrocketspy621|Teamrocketspy621]] 04:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
They did say they tried to pace themselves making Gen V. When you consider all the work that is put into each individual Pokémon, (Animated front/backsprite, movepool, stats, type, design, Sugi art, etc.) they might have been like "Ehh; why bother."-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== "Based off" == | |||
C'mon guys. Correct grammar, please. [[User:Takharii|<span style="color:#FFD733;">'''たか'''</span>]][[User talk:Takharii|<span style="color:#DAA520;">'''はり'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Takharii|<span style="color:#B69E00;">'''い'''</span>]] 05:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:19, 11 February 2011
The reason why there aren't 650?
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- Swagmander 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". - unsigned comment from Arkeon (talk • contribs)
Did it say anywhere in the interview that "Dolly" was planned for Generation V? Because they mentioned the origins of a Generation I Pokemon in the same interview, after all, and besides, I don't think it'd be too hard for them to come up with one more Pokemon to round it out to 650 if they'd really wanted to (but why they didn't is a bit of a mystery to me). Teamrocketspy621 04:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
They did say they tried to pace themselves making Gen V. When you consider all the work that is put into each individual Pokémon, (Animated front/backsprite, movepool, stats, type, design, Sugi art, etc.) they might have been like "Ehh; why bother."-- Swagmander 03:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
"Based off"
C'mon guys. Correct grammar, please. たかはりい 05:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)