2,465
edits
→Umm...
(→Umm...) |
(→Umm...) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:::I'm pretty positive that we have ''Arceus: the Conquering of Spacetime'' as our accepted title. Can we try and move it on the 'pedia? It makes more sense than ''Arceus: To the Conquering of Spacetime'' | :::I'm pretty positive that we have ''Arceus: the Conquering of Spacetime'' as our accepted title. Can we try and move it on the 'pedia? It makes more sense than ''Arceus: To the Conquering of Spacetime'' | ||
::::Blah, it's because "to" isn't there and "conquering" is a verb or so it's been said. Arceus: The Conquest of Spacetime, or Arceus: Toward Conquering Spacetime, makes sense. [[User:TTEchidna|TTEchidna]] 05:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC) | ::::Blah, it's because "to" isn't there and "conquering" is a verb or so it's been said. Arceus: The Conquest of Spacetime, or Arceus: Toward Conquering Spacetime, makes sense. [[User:TTEchidna|TTEchidna]] 05:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Keep what you want on Bulbapedia. I refuse to use a title on Bulbanews, however, that doesn't make sense. Gin thinks the best translation is ''[http://heerosferret.livejournal.com/862406.html?thread=5436870#t5436870 Space-Time Conquered]''. I do not care for "Conquered" because it is passive, and I still think the へ implies a '''process of conquering''', hence ''The Conquering of Spacetime''. The process is implied in that translation. I don't think the へ is meant as a literal "to" or "toward," at least not when translated into English. What about ''Conquering Spacetime''? That also implies a process and retains the verb. In any case, why can't they give us English versions of the titles like they did with the first four movies? X| --[[User:Argy|Argy]] 16:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC) | |||