2
edits
(haxxored from bulbapedia (credit where credit's due)) |
STHedgehog (talk | contribs) (this isn't news) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
I like the idea of a light type. I've hoped for one since the original gold/silver... But I don't think it's happening. Psychic is the equivalent of a "light" type, as evidenced in the Eeveelution Espeon. Also, additional types is a major change that the creators will hesitate to make this late in the series. Steel and Dark were previously introduced in Gen. II, but that was a unique transition time- Most of the major obvious changes we think about from the originals to the present happened in gold and silver. Certainly, changes have been made in the third and fourth generations, and will continue to be made, but in my opinion, nothing on the scale of another type. The largest change I could possibly imagine in the future would be something like an ability for Pokémon to hold two items at once, and that only because of the recent rising importance of held items. So, sad to say, I do not see a light type in the future. {{unsigned|Nekron}} | I like the idea of a light type. I've hoped for one since the original gold/silver... But I don't think it's happening. Psychic is the equivalent of a "light" type, as evidenced in the Eeveelution Espeon. Also, additional types is a major change that the creators will hesitate to make this late in the series. Steel and Dark were previously introduced in Gen. II, but that was a unique transition time- Most of the major obvious changes we think about from the originals to the present happened in gold and silver. Certainly, changes have been made in the third and fourth generations, and will continue to be made, but in my opinion, nothing on the scale of another type. The largest change I could possibly imagine in the future would be something like an ability for Pokémon to hold two items at once, and that only because of the recent rising importance of held items. So, sad to say, I do not see a light type in the future. {{unsigned|Nekron}} | ||
:This is for the forums.--[[User:Pokelova|<span style="color:#FF0000;">''I'm Pokelova''</span>]][[User talk:Pokelova|<sup style="font-family:Vivaldi"><sup style="color:#FF0000;"><big>''(Talk)''</big></sup></sup>]] 07:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | :This is for the forums.--[[User:Pokelova|<span style="color:#FF0000;">''I'm Pokelova''</span>]][[User talk:Pokelova|<sup style="font-family:Vivaldi"><sup style="color:#FF0000;"><big>''(Talk)''</big></sup></sup>]] 07:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
==What is this?== | |||
This isn't news, it isn't even an editorial, it's a forum post put under the news section. It even has a link to the forums! I know I've registered this compliant before but I don't think editorials and other non news posts should be put in the news sections, and especially not this. There is no real point to this article, it is not news worthy, it provides no new information to the reader. It is just a series of rumors tied together as an advertisement for a forum thread. My point is this doesn't belong in the news section. | |||
Thank you for taking the time to read this all the way through, I hope you will consider my suggestion, sorry if I got a little ranty there. [[User:STHedgehog|STHedgehog]] 17:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
edits