Talk:October CoroCoro begins to leak: Difference between revisions

(→‎Starter Evo page: new section)
Line 22: Line 22:


If the legitimacy of that page is indeed in question, then shouldn't the info boxes for those pokemon be removed? [[User:Morgil27|Morgil27]] 06:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
If the legitimacy of that page is indeed in question, then shouldn't the info boxes for those pokemon be removed? [[User:Morgil27|Morgil27]] 06:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
== Starter Evo page ==
It would be nice if the Bulbanews editors actually looked at their sources more carefully; was the only reason you accepted [http://i52.tinypic.com/24wrrzd.jpg] as a source because it came from the Bulbagarden forum, or is the pre-release rush lowering your standards so you can keep up with everyone else? If you had indeed read more carefully, you would have noticed that the last pages, containing the starter Pokemon's evolutions, were actually scanned in English reading order. If they were scanned in Japanese reading order, then the numbers would indeed be on the outer edge of the pages like the other scans. They're as real as real can be, if for example that Chaobu has been mentioned in other, 'genuine', pages. --[[User:Trance|Trance]] 09:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
5

edits