Talk:Fansites served with copyright infringement notices: Difference between revisions

Talk:Fansites served with copyright infringement notices (view source)

Revision as of 20:59, 23 September 2010

102 bytes added , 23 September 2010

no edit summary

Semerl

4

edits

Revision as of 19:18, 22 September 2010 (view source) Nick15 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Just FYI: Reposting Copyrighted Material is PROTECTED by US Copyright Law) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:59, 23 September 2010 (view source) Semerl (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 41:		Line 41:

	:: Well, I will say that this doesn't count if you're reposting the ROM to Black and/or White or share the soundtrack of the game verbatim, without any mention of it being used for a review or parody (ie a remix), then Fair Use laws don't cover that. But if Nintendo is requesting to take ALL Black/White material offline (such as screenshots, gameplay footage, review of new Pokémon and features, and so forth), then Nintendo can't FORCE you to take it down because that's protected by Fair Use Laws. Just FYI! :) --- [[User:Nick15\|Nick15]] 19:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)		:: Well, I will say that this doesn't count if you're reposting the ROM to Black and/or White or share the soundtrack of the game verbatim, without any mention of it being used for a review or parody (ie a remix), then Fair Use laws don't cover that. But if Nintendo is requesting to take ALL Black/White material offline (such as screenshots, gameplay footage, review of new Pokémon and features, and so forth), then Nintendo can't FORCE you to take it down because that's protected by Fair Use Laws. Just FYI! :) --- [[User:Nick15\|Nick15]] 19:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

			Now you know why I want to boycott the games.--[[User:Semerl\|Semerl]] 20:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)