42
edits
Talk:Nintendo releases patch for Pokémon XY (view source)
Revision as of 15:47, 25 October 2013
, 25 October 2013no edit summary
(Added comments regarding 1-2 article errors.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You misspelled Glitch as flitch. [[User:Tag365|Tag365]] ([[User talk:Tag365|talk]]) 14:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | You misspelled Glitch as flitch. [[User:Tag365|Tag365]] ([[User talk:Tag365|talk]]) 14:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
:: I was about to say the same thing about | :: I was about to say the same thing about [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InherentlyFunnyWords "flitch"]. XD Kind of strange how the typo slipped through, since it's glaringly in the article's first sentence. Still, mistakes ''do'' happen... [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 15:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Subject/Verb Agreement == | == Subject/Verb Agreement == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[[User:Kylalak|Kylalak]] ([[User talk:Kylalak|talk]]) 14:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | --[[User:Kylalak|Kylalak]] ([[User talk:Kylalak|talk]]) 14:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
:: I was about to say the same thing, although I think that the grammar is technically okay if the writer was utilizing British English, since there seems to be some strange rules regarding plurality of some words/entities, where past-tense-related terms like "were/have" can be used for things that normally would be perceived as singular in American English (see [http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/937281-dragon-quest-ix-sentinels-of-the-starry-skies/55535176 this thread] for an example, pertaining to the statement "the enemy '''is/are''' defeated"). My personal opinion is that the statements of the Bulbanews article in question should be "Nintendo was" and "Nintendo has", which seems more proper, but I'll wait to see some other editors' opinions... [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 15:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | :: I was about to say the same thing, although I think that the grammar is technically okay if the writer was utilizing British English, since there seems to be some strange rules regarding plurality of some words/entities, where past-tense-related terms like "were/have" can be used for things that normally would be perceived as singular in American English (see [http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/937281-dragon-quest-ix-sentinels-of-the-starry-skies/55535176 this thread] for an example, pertaining to the statement "the enemy '''is/are''' defeated" in one of the '"Dragon Quest'' series' installments). My personal opinion is that the statements of the Bulbanews article in question should be "Nintendo was" and "Nintendo has", which seems more proper, but I'll wait to see some other editors' opinions... [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 15:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | ||