4
edits
Talk:Nintendo releases patch for Pokémon XY (view source)
Revision as of 17:28, 25 October 2013
, 25 October 2013→Update Size: new section
mNo edit summary |
(→Update Size: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:: I was about to say the same thing, although I think that the grammar is technically okay if the writer was utilizing British English, since there seems to be some strange rules regarding plurality of some words/entities, where past-tense-related terms like "were/have" can be used for things that normally would be perceived as singular in American English (see [http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/937281-dragon-quest-ix-sentinels-of-the-starry-skies/55535176 this thread] for an example, pertaining to the statement "the enemy '''is/are''' defeated" in one of the ''Dragon Quest'' series' installments). My personal opinion is that the statements of the Bulbanews article in question should be "Nintendo was" and "Nintendo has", which seems more proper, but I'll wait to see some other editors' opinions... [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 15:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | :: I was about to say the same thing, although I think that the grammar is technically okay if the writer was utilizing British English, since there seems to be some strange rules regarding plurality of some words/entities, where past-tense-related terms like "were/have" can be used for things that normally would be perceived as singular in American English (see [http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/937281-dragon-quest-ix-sentinels-of-the-starry-skies/55535176 this thread] for an example, pertaining to the statement "the enemy '''is/are''' defeated" in one of the ''Dragon Quest'' series' installments). My personal opinion is that the statements of the Bulbanews article in question should be "Nintendo was" and "Nintendo has", which seems more proper, but I'll wait to see some other editors' opinions... [[User:Fenyx4|Fenyx4]] ([[User talk:Fenyx4|talk]]) 15:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Update Size == | |||
Just updated and for me, on Y, the update was 229 blocks, not 227. Not a major difference, but just worth noting. | |||